OSD must request apportionment under CRs.

OSD must request apportionment under CRs.

• A. True
• B. Often
• C. Not required
• D. False

Answer: (D)

Understanding how continuing resolutions work helps here. Apportionment is the process that distributes budget authority into time periods and programs so obligations stay within approved limits. When a continuing resolution is in effect, agencies are authorized to incur obligations at existing levels for a defined period. That CR itself provides the authority needed to operate, so there isn’t a need to issue separate apportionments for every program just because a CR is in place. Therefore, OSD does not have to request a new apportionment under a CR. The CR establishes the funding level and timing, and obligations are allowed within that framework. There are occasional exceptions if a CR imposes special limits or requires reprogramming actions, but as a general rule, apportionment requests are not required under a continuing resolution.

Understanding how continuing resolutions work helps here. Apportionment is the process that distributes budget authority into time periods and programs so obligations stay within approved limits. When a continuing resolution is in effect, agencies are authorized to incur obligations at existing levels for a defined period. That CR itself provides the authority needed to operate, so there isn’t a need to issue separate apportionments for every program just because a CR is in place.

Therefore, OSD does not have to request a new apportionment under a CR. The CR establishes the funding level and timing, and obligations are allowed within that framework. There are occasional exceptions if a CR imposes special limits or requires reprogramming actions, but as a general rule, apportionment requests are not required under a continuing resolution.